Files
gigachad-library/double-dipping-alimony-whores.html

54 lines
5.8 KiB
HTML
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<title>Double-Dipping Alimony Whores — GigaChad</title>
<link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/style.css?v=1">
<meta property="og:type" content="website">
<meta property="og:title" content="Double-Dipping Alimony Whores — GigaChad">
<meta property="og:description" content="The greatest website on the interwebz!">
<meta property="og:image" content="/icons/chads/chad.png">
</head>
<body>
<script>
const setTheme = () => {
const root = document.documentElement
const storage = localStorage.length > 0 ? localStorage : sessionStorage
for (let key in storage) {
if (storage.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
root.style.setProperty(key, storage.getItem(key))
}
}
}
setTheme()
document.addEventListener('visibilitychange', () => { if (!document.hidden) setTheme() })
</script>
<h1>Double-Dipping Alimony Whores</h1>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="/"><img class="epic" src="/icons/chads/chad.png"></a>
</div>
<hr>
<p class="nav"><span class="nav-left">Listed under <a href="/heartiste-2012.html">Heartiste: 2012</a>.</span><span class="nav-right"><a href="/theme.html">Theme</a></span></p>
<p>From the <a href="https://heartiste.org/2012/12/13/double-dipping-alimony-whores/" target="_blank">original article</a> on December 13, 2012. Author: <a href="https://heartiste.org/" target="_blank">Chateau Heartiste</a>.</p>
<!-- This article was generated automatically using GigaChad System Alpha: HEARTISTE v1.0. If there are any stylistic errors or bugs, please report them. -->
<p>We here at CH don’t just knock women off their princess pedestals (or knock men out from under them), we grind the pedestal into dust and toss the ashes into the Pacific breeze. But even our yeoman efforts occasionally struggle to adequately express the depraved depths of unrestricted female nature. Apropos, a reader writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>Hi. I ran across your blog through a Google search. It looks very interesting and I am for sure going to read more later tonight after work. I was wondering if you had any advice for second wives that are married to nice guys that are paying alimony to an ex-wife that might have gotten secretly remarried to their elderly boyfriend? I’m sorry that sentence is so complicated.</p><p>Me: Wife #2</p><p>Me thinks: Wife #1 secretly remarried and is “double-dipping.”</p><p>Wife #1′s boyfriend: considerably older than her and has no heirs</p><p>She has tried to financially double-dip in the past, has a history of lying, there’s no nation-wide search we can run to check this out, and besides just having to pay back the money, there’s no downside like jail time or punitive fines for secretly remarrying and continuing to collect alimony from Husband #1.</p><p>Any suggestions would be super helpful!</p></blockquote>
<p>Alimony double-dipping by ex-wives is real, and since it affects the resource pool of women hitched to the victimized ex-husbands, dumbshit man-haters can’t go around calling those men “whiners” without also incriminating their newly beloved women for the same illusory crime against status preening. Thus, we hear SILENCE TOTAL from the feminist kunt kollective on this matter of alimony double-dipping, which undoubtedly occurs with greater frequency than official tallies claim. Speaking of official tallies... where the hell are they? Is this mass buttfucking of betaboy cogs just one of those crimes that no one in power gives a rat’s ass about to even bother writing a report?</p>
<p>Double-dipping alimony whores are nearly the worst of the hypergamous worst. Second only to knowing cuckolders who try to foist alpha issue on unsuspecting beta providers. Think about the utter degradation, the abject humiliation, these craven harlots visit upon their ex-betas:</p>
<p>1. Coerces alimony payments from beta ex freed from any sex obligation in return.</p>
<p>2. Shacks up with new alpha lover and uses ex-beta’s coerced payments to buy sexy lingerie as demanded by alpha.</p>
<p>3. Refrains from reporting relationship. Gets to enjoy continued flow of resources from both new alpha lover and estranged beta ex.</p>
<p>4. Beta ex’s money now going to buy not only ex-wife’s pre-coituswear, but her alpha lover’s cock rings.</p>
<p>5. Cackles to herself how easy it is to keep kids away from schlubby beta ex.</p>
<p>6. Impoverishes beta ex and kneecaps his ability to find and keep a new woman to give him love.</p>
<p>What I just described above is the legal equivalent of getting a meth-addled ferret shoved up your ass, pulled out, and then shoved into your mouth to lick it clean. I believe the Latinate term is AF2MF, Ass-Ferret-to-Mouth-Ferret.</p>
<p>What man in his right mind would go to war for such a system?</p>
<p>Having never gotten myself entangled in the vulgarities of the divorce-industrial complex, all I can tell you, dear reader, is to find whatever shred of evidence that you can of your husband’s ex-wife’s remarriage and present it to a family court. This may mean coaxing your husband to wheedle any kids he may have to cough up the goods on their mother. Surprisingly, despite years of mommy poisoning the well, many children can see through her machinations and retain affection and loyalty to their father. But channels of communication will have to be open for this strategy to work.</p>
<p>In the meantime, you should do your best to ostracize any female or manboob acquaintances who parrot feminist lies in your presence. It’s a small act of rebellion, but big revolutions are seeded with the polite vengeances of individuals.</p>
<hr>
<p class="C">Library of GigaChad | <a href="/" target="_blank">GigaChad</a></p>
</body>
</html>