Files
gigachad-library/the-emotional-manipulability-of-women.html

50 lines
4.5 KiB
HTML
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<title>The Emotional Manipulability Of Women — GigaChad</title>
<link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/style.css?v=1">
<meta property="og:type" content="website">
<meta property="og:title" content="The Emotional Manipulability Of Women — GigaChad">
<meta property="og:description" content="The greatest website on the interwebz!">
<meta property="og:image" content="/icons/chads/chad.png">
</head>
<body>
<script>
const setTheme = () => {
const root = document.documentElement
const storage = localStorage.length > 0 ? localStorage : sessionStorage
for (let key in storage) {
if (storage.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
root.style.setProperty(key, storage.getItem(key))
}
}
}
setTheme()
document.addEventListener('visibilitychange', () => { if (!document.hidden) setTheme() })
</script>
<h1>The Emotional Manipulability Of Women</h1>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="/"><img class="epic" src="/icons/chads/chad.png"></a>
</div>
<hr>
<p class="nav"><span class="nav-left">Listed under <a href="/heartiste-2014.html">Heartiste: 2014</a>.</span><span class="nav-right"><a href="/theme.html">Theme</a></span></p>
<p>From the <a href="https://heartiste.org/2014/04/17/the-emotional-manipulability-of-women/" target="_blank">original article</a> on April 17, 2014. Author: <a href="https://heartiste.org/" target="_blank">Chateau Heartiste</a>.</p>
<!-- This article was generated automatically using GigaChad System Alpha: HEARTISTE v1.0. If there are any stylistic errors or bugs, please report them. -->
<p>It was a brief vignette shoehorned into the end of the day that nonetheless attested to a meaningful psychological and social difference between the sexes.</p>
<p>I was walking</p>
<a href="/files/87pdpBoH.gif" target="_blank"><img class="center" src="/files/87pdpBoH.gif"></a>
<p>dislodging a buttplug</p>
<p>down a busy sidewalk when I noticed a young-ish black (and possibly gay) guy asking for high fives from passersby. He had something like a clipboard in his hand, but I wasn’t interested enough to determine whether he was a snazzily dressed street bum performing for loose change or a campaigner for some idiotic cause.</p>
<p>In the time it took me to first notice him and walk past him, three (white) women and two (white) men were accosted by his street performance shenanigans. As each neared, he would spit his loudmouthed pitch and histrionically hoist his hand for a high five. All three women complied, reaching upward to meet his hand with sheepish grins and blushing faces. The two men sneered or frowned and swerved away from his entreaties.</p>
<p>(If you’re wondering what I did, I didn’t swerve. I walked right into his jabber zone and right out of it without an iota of acknowledgment.)</p>
<p>The scene was a reminder how emotionally manipulable women are, compared to men. I’ve seen similar scenes unfold hundreds, perhaps thousands of times, and the same sex disparity in call-and-response emerges: Women are more apt to obey the commands of an annoying (if friendly) stranger than are men. This instinct is likely a property of women’s greater predilection for group cohesion and agreeableness, probably mixed in with some latent desire to submit to a man who’s large and in charge.</p>
<p>One reason game works so well on women has to do with their greater degree of emotional manipulability. A man who understands that women are more impressionable creatures who will reflexively follow strong leadership is a man who gets laid. Indecisive betas earn women’s disgust and cruelty; decisive (some would call “douchey”) alphas earn women’s love and respect.</p>
<p>Some game concepts, like calculated scarcity, are universal and will work, more or less, on both sexes. But women are much more susceptible to these unisex game techniques because of the nature of their paper-thin emotional defenses against such manipulation. This is how you know that the occasional dumbfuck female contrarian who comes on here to shriekishly assert how game works just as well on men is full of shit. Yes, some of these game tactics can work on men... weak beta men with dispositions not unlike that of women. In contrast, game works on all women, and works best, ironically, on the best-looking women.</p>
<hr>
<p class="C">Library of GigaChad | <a href="/" target="_blank">GigaChad</a></p>
</body>
</html>