gigachad-library/realtalker-of-the-month.html

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
    <title>Realtalker Of The Month — GigaChad</title>
    <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico">
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="/style.css?v=1">
    <meta property="og:type" content="website">
    <meta property="og:title" content="Realtalker Of The Month — GigaChad">
    <meta property="og:description" content="The greatest website on the interwebz!">
    <meta property="og:image" content="/icons/chads/chad.png">
</head>
<body>
<script>
const setTheme = () => {
    const root = document.documentElement
    const storage = localStorage.length > 0 ? localStorage : sessionStorage
    for (let key in storage) {
        if (storage.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
            root.style.setProperty(key, storage.getItem(key))
        }
    }
}
setTheme()
document.addEventListener('visibilitychange', () => { if (!document.hidden) setTheme() })
</script>
    <h1>Realtalker Of The Month</h1>
    <div style="text-align: center;">
        <a href="/"><img class="epic" src="/icons/chads/chad.png"></a>
    </div>
    <hr>
<p class="nav"><span class="nav-left">Listed under <a href="/heartiste-2012.html">Heartiste: 2012</a>.</span><span class="nav-right"><a href="/theme.html">Theme</a></span></p>
<p>From the <a href="https://heartiste.org/2012/08/09/realtalker-of-the-month/" target="_blank">original article</a> on August 9, 2012. Author: <a href="https://heartiste.org/" target="_blank">Chateau Heartiste</a>.</p>
  <!-- This article was generated automatically using GigaChad System Alpha: HEARTISTE v1.0. If there are any stylistic errors or bugs, please report them. -->
  <p>A Turkish newspaper columnist with brass balls <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20120816184139/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2185510/Newspaper-columnist-provokes-worldwide-outrage-saying-Olympic-Games-destroying-female-figure.html" target="_blank">wrote an article</a> about the unattractive manliness of female athletes.</p>
  <blockquote><p>A Turkish newspaper columnist has been heavily criticised after writing an article which said the Olympic Games is destroying the female figure.</p><p>The piece – called Womanhood is dying at the Olympics’ – was written by Yuksel Aytug and was published in the daily newspaper Sabah and on the paper’s website.</p><p>However, it soon spread around the world by saying the Games was distorting women’s bodies and that extra points should be given to female athletes based on how feminine they looked.</p><p>According to Hurriyet Daily News, he said: ‘Broad-shouldered, flat-chested women with small hips; [they are] totally indistinguishable from men.</p><p>‘Their breasts – the symbol of womanhood, motherhood – flattened into stubs as they were seen as mere hindrances to speed.’</p></blockquote>
  <p>Get this man a VIP pass to the Chateau! He speaks the truth no nancyboy or femcunt would ever dare admit, even to themselves. Who with the eyes to see hasn’t noticed the narrow hips, the grotesque six-pack abs (never a good look on women), the chest “stubs”, the linebacker shoulders, and the manjaws of an inordinate number of the female Olympians? (Synchronized swimmers are a welcome exception to the rule. Of course, proficiency in synchronized swimming doesn’t require a chiseled male-like physique.)</p>
  <a href="/files/CBQPBc43.gif" target="_blank"><img class="center" src="/files/CBQPBc43.gif"></a>
  <p>A disturbing number of the women athletes have what amounts to ripped, pubescent boys’ bodies. If you cover the faces and crotches of some of them, you could easily mistake them for lean men. But I bet they fuck like champions! </p>
  <blockquote><p>[Aytug] was accused of sexism and reducing the identity of women purely to appearance.</p></blockquote>
  <p>Weren’t the Jizzebelers recently objectifying Ryan Lochte’s appearance? Anyhow, the point is superfluous. Feminists are simply unable to come to grips with the fact that double standards in how the sexes relate to and perceive each other exist, are grounded in immutable biology, and won’t disappear just because a few fat sluts organized a pride parade.</p>
  <blockquote><p>In his column, he also said the Olympic Games forced woman to look more like men so they could become successful.</p></blockquote>
  <p>Aytug is right. It’s NECESSARILY true that women must conform more to the male physique ideal in order to compete successfully in sports, and particularly elite sports, because women’s natural bodies are not evolutionarily designed to run, throw, fight or lift optimally like men’s bodies are designed to do. Women’s bodies are — and I know this will get under the skin of the right sort of losers — shaped by the relentless laws of nature to fulfill TWO PRIME DIRECTIVES:</p>
  <p>Visually please men.</p>
  <p>And bear children.</p>
  <p>Everything else women do is commentary.</p>
  <p>If you are a woman who wants to long jump, or throw a discus, or box, or run the 100 meter race, you will perform better the FURTHER your body gets from the archetypal female physique and the closer it gets to the archetypal male physique. Hips and boobs and upper body weakness undermine all that Olympian kickassery.</p>
  <p>This is why unscrupulous countries (which includes just about all the Western and Communist or formerly Communist ones) pump so much money and, when they can get away with it, steroids into their female athletic programs and athletes. They know that they can get more medal bang for their buck by masculinizing their female athletes and pushing them, however unintentionally, to assume male physical forms, (or by recruiting women with inborn male-like physiques), because there are a lot fewer women who are 1) interested in high-level competitive sports and 2) willing to sacrifice their femininity for a rigorous masculinizing regiment.</p>
  <p>Someday a real rain will come and wash away this mountain of gender-bending lies. And when it happens, the world’s femininely-renewed women will sway their child-bearing hips and heave their bounteous breasts as their charmingly soft limbs and delicate hands are raised heavenward in thankfulness for being relieved of the pressure to look and act like men.</p>
  <p>PS Isn’t it ironic, then, how the feminist-defined pursuit of sex “””equality””” is essentially tantamount to making women more man-like? You’d almost think feminists believe the male form and male psyche are superior to the female form and psyche. Maybe that’s because most dedicated feminists are <a href="/the-psychology-of-feminists-and-manboobs.html" target="_blank">ugly, masculine robodykes</a>.</p>
    <hr>
    <p class="C">Library of GigaChad | <a href="/" target="_blank">GigaChad</a></p>
</body>
</html>