Files
gigachad-library/math-is-hard.html
T

44 lines
4.7 KiB
HTML

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<title>Math is Hard — GigaChad</title>
<link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/style.css?v=1">
<meta property="og:type" content="website">
<meta property="og:title" content="Math is Hard — GigaChad">
<meta property="og:description" content="The greatest website on the interwebz!">
<meta property="og:image" content="/icons/chads/chad.png">
</head>
<body>
<script>
const setTheme = () => {
const root = document.documentElement
const storage = localStorage.length > 0 ? localStorage : sessionStorage
for (let key in storage) {
if (storage.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
root.style.setProperty(key, storage.getItem(key))
}
}
}
setTheme()
document.addEventListener('visibilitychange', () => { if (!document.hidden) setTheme() })
</script>
<h1>Math is Hard</h1>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="/"><img class="epic" src="/icons/chads/chad.png"></a>
</div>
<hr>
<p class="nav"><span class="nav-left">Listed under <a href="/homosexuality.html">Homosexuality</a>.</span><span class="nav-right"><a href="/theme.html">Theme</a></span></p>
<p>From the <a href="https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2013/04/09/math-is-hard/" target="_blank">original article</a> on April 9, 2013. Author: <a href="https://westhunt.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">West Hunter</a>.</p>
<p>Definitely the case for E. O. Wilson. In a recent essay in the Wall Street Journal, he says that many of the most successful scientists are no more than semiliterate in mathematics, and if anything he&#8217;s worse than that. But, he says, you don&#8217;t really need to know much mathematics in most of biology, and it&#8217;s a pity that students are dropping out of science because they fear mathematics.</p>
<p>There are those who differ. Lord Kelvin said &#8220;I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind; it may be the beginning of knowledge, but you have scarcely, in your thoughts, advanced to the stage of <em>science</em>, whatever the matter may be.&#8221; Even those who didn&#8217;t have much math sometimes wished that they did. Chuck Darwin said “I have deeply regretted that I did not proceed far enough at least to understand something of the great leading principles of mathematics; for men thus endowed seem to have an extra sense.”</p>
<p>E. O. Wilson would have benefited from having that extra sense. If he had it, he might not have suggested that ridiculous &#8220;gay uncle&#8221; theory, in which homosexuality pays for itself genetically thru gay men helping their siblings in ways that produce extra nieces and nephews. First, that doesn&#8217;t even happen &#8211; so much for field work. Second, it&#8217;s impossible. The relationship coefficients don&#8217;t work. Nephews and nieces are only half as closely related as your own kids, so you&#8217;d need four extra to break even, rather than two, as with your own kids. Maybe if Wilson had ever learned to <strong><em>divide by two</em></strong>, he wouldn&#8217;t have made this mistake.</p>
<p>Biology and softer-headed sciences such as anthropology are absolutely rife with innumerates, and there is a cost. If I hear one more person say that average growth rates were very low in the old stone age, a teeny tiny fraction of a percent [true], and so anatomically modern humans only left Africa after it filled up, which took a hundred thousand years, I&#8217;m gonna scream. If I hear another anthropologist say that she could understand how a small group could rapidly expand to fill New Zealand, but just can&#8217;t see how they could fill up the Americas, whole continents, in a thousand years &#8211; lady, they screwed, they had babies, and they walked. All it took was a weird, unacademic lifestyle in which you raised three kids &#8211; pretty easy to do in the Happy Hunting Ground.</p>
<p>I remember talking to a field biologist studying three genetic male morphs of some screwy freshwater fish. In passing, I said &#8221; Of course all three forms have to have the same average fitness, over the long term.&#8221; He said &#8221; Why?&#8221;, because he was an idiot. Speaking of which &#8211; general intelligence and math ability are fairly well correlated. Maybe a lot of these low-math types just aren&#8217;t very smart. I&#8217;ve never seen any sign that E. O. Wilson is.</p>
<hr>
<p class="C">Library of GigaChad | <a href="/" target="_blank">GigaChad</a></p>
</body>
</html>